International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

22.1k citations
2.0k papers · · active since 2016

Impact in

Papers in

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

1.4k papers receiving 16.1k citations

Peers

International Journal of Pharmacy Practice
Comparison fields: 5 of 204
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 7.6k
  • Family Practice 1.5k
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 1.2k
  • Emergency Medical Services 1.3k
  • Toxicology 551
Replace Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy with:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy United States
Journal of the American Pharmacists Association United States
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy United Kingdom
Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care Sweden
Journal of Hospital Medicine United States
The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine United States
Patient Preference and Adherence United States
Health Technology Assessment United Kingdom
The Annals of Family Medicine United States
Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research Australia
International Journal of Pharmacy Practice relative to Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy United States Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Journal of Pharmacy Practice more than expected).

Fields of papers published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice.

About International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

The 2.0k papers published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice in the last decades have received a total of 22.1k indexed citations . Papers published in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice usually cover Geriatrics and Gerontology (717 papers), Family Practice (115 papers), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (93 papers), Medical Terminology (7 papers) and General Health Professions (379 papers) specifically the topics of Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (717 papers), Medication Adherence and Compliance (106 papers), Pharmaceutical studies and practices (97 papers), Antibiotic Use and Resistance (93 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (88 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (72 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (70 papers) and Health Sciences Research and Education (56 papers). The most active scholars publishing in International Journal of Pharmacy Practice are Christine M Bond, Felicity J. Smith, Karen Hassell, Margaret C Watson, Alison Blenkinsopp, Judith Anne Cantrill, David Kenneth Raynor, Ines Krass, Jeff Harrison and Anne Gerd Granås.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact