John M. Starkey

585 citations
25 papers · 430 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

John M. Starkey

22 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers

John M. Starkey
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Automotive Engineering 257
  • Architecture 16
  • Control and Systems Engineering 173
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 130
  • Mechanical Engineering 184
Replace Zbyněk Šika with:
Zbyněk Šika Czechia
Suresh Thenozhi Mexico
W. Kortüm United States
László Palkovics Hungary
Ondřej Vaculín Germany
J. Vanek United States
N.J. Theron South Africa
Egidio Di Gialleonardo Italy
Wuwei Chen China
John M. Starkey relative to Zbyněk Šika Czechia Zbyněk Šika's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Zbyněk Šika · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John M. Starkey

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John M. Starkey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John M. Starkey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John M. Starkey more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John M. Starkey

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John M. Starkey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John M. Starkey. The network helps show where John M. Starkey may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside John M. Starkey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John M. Starkey Line = papers co-authored together John M. Starkey links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1995150
2 200239
3 198739
4 198336
5 199230
6 199423
7 200019
8 198815
9 198610
10 199410
11 199010
12 200210
13 19938
14 19965
15 19965
16 19885
17 20045
18 19884
19
OVERVIEW OF VEHICLE MODELS, DYNAMICS, AND CONTROL APPLIED TO AUTOMATED VEHICLES
19913
20 19922

About John M. Starkey

John M. Starkey is a scholar working on Automotive Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Civil and Structural Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 25 papers that have together received 430 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vehicle Dynamics and Control Systems (14 papers), Mechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research (10 papers), Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (3 papers), Real-time simulation and control systems (3 papers), Soil Mechanics and Vehicle Dynamics (3 papers), Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design (3 papers), Traffic control and management (3 papers) and Robotic Path Planning Algorithms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (257 citations), Architecture (16 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (173 citations), Civil and Structural Engineering (130 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (184 citations). John M. Starkey has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Japan. Frequent co-authors include D. Smith, James E. Bernard, Patricia Davies, Robert Benton, J. E. Bernard, Scott Gray, Robert J. Bernhard, Michael R. Petersen, Dorothy DeWitt and Robert W. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series, International Journal of Vehicle Design, Journal of vibration and acoustics, Vehicle System Dynamics and Journal of Engineering Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact