General Relativity and Gravitation

73.8k citations
4.9k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
    • Advanced Differential Geometry Research
    • Relativity and Gravitational Theory
    • Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics

Papers in

    • Cosmology and Gravitation Theories 3.5k
    • Relativity and Gravitational Theory 1.1k
    • Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research 746
    • Advanced Differential Geometry Research 629
    • Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations 298
    • Black Holes and Theoretical Physics 3.0k

General Relativity and Gravitation

4.4k papers receiving 69.0k citations

Peers

General Relativity and Gravitation
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 65.2k
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 51.9k
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 18.6k
  • Oceanography 4.4k
  • Applied Mathematics 3.5k
Replace The European Physical Journal C with:
The European Physical Journal C Germany
International Journal of Theoretical Physics China
Modern Physics Letters A United States
Progress of Theoretical Physics Japan
International Journal of Modern Physics A United States
Classical and Quantum Gravity United States
Computer Physics Communications United States
Astrophysics and Space Science United States
The European Physical Journal Plus China
Physica Scripta China
General Relativity and Gravitation relative to The European Physical Journal C Germany The European Physical Journal C's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
The European Physical Journal C · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in General Relativity and Gravitation

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in General Relativity and Gravitation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in General Relativity and Gravitation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites General Relativity and Gravitation more than expected).

Fields of papers published in General Relativity and Gravitation

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in General Relativity and Gravitation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in General Relativity and Gravitation.

About General Relativity and Gravitation

The 4.9k papers published in General Relativity and Gravitation in the last decades have received a total of 73.8k indexed citations . Papers published in General Relativity and Gravitation usually cover Astronomy and Astrophysics (4.2k papers), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (3.1k papers), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (1.3k papers), Oceanography (398 papers) and Applied Mathematics (332 papers) specifically the topics of Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3.5k papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (3.0k papers), Relativity and Gravitational Theory (1.1k papers), Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories (874 papers), Pulsars and Gravitational Waves Research (746 papers), Advanced Differential Geometry Research (629 papers), Geophysics and Gravity Measurements (398 papers) and Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations (298 papers). The most active scholars publishing in General Relativity and Gravitation are Roger Penrose, George Ellis, K.S. Stelle, S. Deser, Salvatore Capozzıello, Mark Van Raamsdonk, M. Francaviglia, Thomas Buchert, Irina Dymnikova and Friedrich W. Hehl.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact