Phillip E. Parker

413 citations
17 papers · 208 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Phillip E. Parker

15 papers receiving 183 citations

Peers

Phillip E. Parker
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Applied Mathematics 97
  • Geometry and Topology 75
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 106
  • Mathematical Physics 49
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 56
Replace Marek Kossowski with:
Marek Kossowski United States
Fernando Etayo Spain
L. M. Sibner United States
Alan Weinstein United States
M. M. Schiffer United States
Albert Crumeyrolle France
Marco Castrillón López Spain
Hans–Bert Rademacher Germany
L. M. Woodward United Kingdom
T. N. Bailey United Kingdom
Phillip E. Parker relative to Marek Kossowski United States Marek Kossowski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Marek Kossowski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip E. Parker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip E. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip E. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip E. Parker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip E. Parker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip E. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip E. Parker. The network helps show where Phillip E. Parker may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 5 scholars most cited alongside Phillip E. Parker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip E. Parker Line = papers co-authored together Phillip E. Parker links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 199752
2
Left-invariant Lorentzian metrics on 3-dimensional Lie groups
199740
3 197927
4 198919
5 198413
6
Morbidity among airline pilots: the AMAS experience. Aviation Medicine Advisory Service.
200111
7 199010
8 19878
9
Isometry groups of pseudoriemannian 2-step nilpotent lie groups
20097
10 19845
11 19954
12 20084
13 19953
14 19952
15 20052
16 19891
17 20040

About Phillip E. Parker

Phillip E. Parker is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Applied Mathematics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics and Mathematical Physics, having authored 17 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Differential Geometry Research (7 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (6 papers), Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (6 papers), Geometry and complex manifolds (4 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (3 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (2 papers) and Advanced Topics in Algebra (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Mathematics (97 citations), Geometry and Topology (75 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (106 citations), Mathematical Physics (49 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (56 citations). Phillip E. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Mexico and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Luis A. Cordero, C. T. J. Dodson, John K. Beem, Gregory A. Fredricks and Peter Gilkey. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics, Nonlinear Analysis, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, Geometriae Dedicata and Journal of Geometry and Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact