John J. Clancy

50 papers receiving 748 citations

Peers

John J. Clancy
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 66
  • Biological Psychiatry 25
  • Hematology 149
  • Immunology 187
  • Transplantation 19
Replace Timo Wirth with:
Timo Wirth Germany
Joanna Góral United States
Thorsten Dürk Germany
Lai Ping Wong United States
Chien-Sin Chen Germany
Marie Pierre Manitz Germany
Ruthann Kibler United States
Rhonna L. Cohen United States
Mathilde Gavillet Switzerland
Cristina Godinho‐Silva Portugal
John J. Clancy relative to Timo Wirth Germany Timo Wirth's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.1×
Timo Wirth · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John J. Clancy

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John J. Clancy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John J. Clancy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John J. Clancy more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John J. Clancy

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John J. Clancy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John J. Clancy. The network helps show where John J. Clancy may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John J. Clancy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John J. Clancy Line = papers co-authored together John J. Clancy links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 51 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004100
2 198798
3 199081
4 197066
5 199360
6 200233
7 198230
8 199423
9 199119
10 199818
11 197617
12 197816
13 198116
14 198315
15 197313
16 198513
17 197812
18 199512
19 200012
20 197710

About John J. Clancy

John J. Clancy is a scholar working on Hematology, Immunology, Behavioral Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Transplantation, having authored 51 papers that have together received 800 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (22 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (9 papers), Immunotoxicology and immune responses (7 papers), Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (7 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Sleep and Wakefulness Research (3 papers), Heat shock proteins research (3 papers) and Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (66 citations), Biological Psychiatry (25 citations), Hematology (149 citations), Immunology (187 citations) and Transplantation (19 citations). John J. Clancy has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Góral, Stanley A. Lorens, Donald Oberleas, A S PRASAD, Herbert L. Mathews, Kottarappat N. Dileepan, Daniel J. Stechschulte, Karen M. Simpson, Subbiah Sangiah and Robert L. Jilka. Their work appears in journals such as Transplantation, The Journal of Immunology, Behavioural Brain Research, Journal of Clinical Immunology and Journal of Cellular Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact