Timo Wirth

27 papers receiving 872 citations

Peers

Timo Wirth
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Biological Psychiatry 37
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 73
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 195
  • Neurology 62
  • Immunology 142
Replace Thomas Birchler with:
Thomas Birchler Switzerland
Ivan Pilipović Serbia
Sumnima Singh United States
Ana C. Liberman Argentina
Dawei Xu China
David Henrique Rodrigues Brazil
Ernest Barbosa United States
J. L. McClellan United States
Ju Zou China
Marie Pierre Manitz Germany
Timo Wirth relative to Thomas Birchler Switzerland Thomas Birchler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.3×
Thomas Birchler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Timo Wirth

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Timo Wirth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Timo Wirth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Timo Wirth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Timo Wirth

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Timo Wirth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Timo Wirth. The network helps show where Timo Wirth may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Timo Wirth, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Timo Wirth Line = papers co-authored together Timo Wirth links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013157
2 2019121
3 201564
4 201053
5 202144
6 201140
7 202140
8 201438
9 201236
10 201935
11 201033
12 202031
13 201228
14 201528
15 201527
16 202426
17 201825
18 201913
19 202313
20 202210

About Timo Wirth

Timo Wirth is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Behavioral Neuroscience, Neurology, Immunology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 889 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (10 papers), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (4 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (4 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers), Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (37 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (73 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (195 citations), Neurology (62 citations) and Immunology (142 citations). Timo Wirth has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Manfred Schedlowski, Harald Engler, Toni Weinhage, Dirk Foell, Georg Varga, Gustavo Pacheco‐López, Johannes Roth, Raphaël Doenlen, Helmut Wittkowski and Aloys Lueken. Their work appears in journals such as Brain Behavior and Immunity, Frontiers in Immunology, Science Translational Medicine, Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders and European Journal of Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact