John Earl

57 papers receiving 2.0k citations

John Earl's Hit Papers

Efficacy of High-Dose versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults 2014 · 557 citations
5570+4+8Years since publication100200300400500

Peers

John Earl
Comparison fields: 5 of 134
  • Clinical Biochemistry 174
  • Transplantation 48
  • Epidemiology 589
  • Biological Psychiatry 43
  • Hematology 153
Replace Thomas Perkmann with:
Thomas Perkmann Austria
Gerald Y. Minuk Canada
Kenneth J. Simpson United Kingdom
Can Li China
Lijian Tao China
Daniel F. Schafer United States
Keum Hwa Lee South Korea
Antonius E. van Herwaarden Netherlands
Bertrand Nalpas France
F Balsano Italy
John Earl relative to Thomas Perkmann Austria Thomas Perkmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Thomas Perkmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Earl

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Earl's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Earl with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Earl more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Earl

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Earl. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Earl. The network helps show where John Earl may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Earl, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Earl Line = papers co-authored together John Earl links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Efficacy of High-Dose versus Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults
Hit paper breakdown →
2014557
2 1988136
3 200677
4 200972
5 201670
6 201062
7 201058
8 200250
9 200249
10 201642
11 201039
12 198739
13 199937
14 200835
15 200434
16 199034
17 200534
18 201433
19 200333
20 201530

About John Earl

John Earl is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Biochemistry, Oncology, Epidemiology and Molecular Biology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 2.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (9 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (5 papers), Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research (4 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (3 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (3 papers), Neonatal Health and Biochemistry (3 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (3 papers) and Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (174 citations), Transplantation (48 citations), Epidemiology (589 citations), Biological Psychiatry (43 citations) and Hematology (153 citations). John Earl has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Christa E. Nath, Peter J. Shaw, Andrew J. McLachlan, Carlos A. DiazGranados, John J. Treanor, Michael D. Decker, Daniel Kirby, H. Keipp Talbot, Sanjay Gurunathan and Nadia Tornieporth. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Biomedical Chromatography, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy and Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact