James Pitt

101 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

James Pitt
Comparison fields: 5 of 141
  • Clinical Biochemistry 1.1k
  • Biochemistry 172
  • Molecular Biology 1.5k
  • Spectroscopy 359
  • Rheumatology 247
Replace Rudolf Flückiger with:
Rudolf Flückiger United States
S.K. Wadman Netherlands
R. J. Pollitt United Kingdom
Shantanu Sengupta India
R. W. E. Watts United Kingdom
K. Bartlett United Kingdom
Sven Lindstedt Sweden
Mortimer Levitz United States
M. Durán Netherlands
Katsuhisa Inoue Japan
James Pitt relative to Rudolf Flückiger United States Rudolf Flückiger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Rudolf Flückiger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pitt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pitt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pitt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pitt. The network helps show where James Pitt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Pitt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pitt Line = papers co-authored together James Pitt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 104 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Principles and applications of liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in clinical biochemistry.
2009262
2 2002209
3 2010132
4 2009130
5 2014101
6 200290
7 199876
8 200676
9 199765
10 201062
11 200359
12 201558
13 200857
14 201556
15 201249
16 201248
17 200947
18 201246
19 199745
20 200243

About James Pitt

James Pitt is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Clinical Biochemistry, Physiology, Genetics and Biochemistry, having authored 104 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (52 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (16 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (10 papers), Biochemical and Molecular Research (9 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (8 papers), Amino Acid Enzymes and Metabolism (8 papers), Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism (6 papers) and Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (1.1k citations), Biochemistry (172 citations), Molecular Biology (1.5k citations), Spectroscopy (359 citations) and Rheumatology (247 citations). James Pitt has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey J. Gorman, Tristan P. Wallis, Heidi Peters, Avihu Boneh, Joy Yaplito‐Lee, Stephen G. Kahler, Sacha Ferdinandusse, Eileen P. Treacy, Ronald J. A. Wanders and Ruth Belostotsky. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease, Molecular Genetics and Metabolism, International Journal of Neonatal Screening, Clinical Chemistry and Journal of Biological Chemistry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact