John E. Greer
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Leslie J. Francis (14 shared papers)John T. Povlishock (6 shared papers)Melissa J. McGinn (3 shared papers)Anders Hånell (3 shared papers)Kimberle M. Jacobs (3 shared papers)Thomas M. Reeves (1 shared paper)Linda L. Phillips (1 shared paper)František Supek (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- British Journal of Religious Education (9 papers)The Journal of Social Psychology (3 papers)Research in Science & Technological Education (3 papers)Personality and Individual Differences (2 papers)Journal of Neuroscience (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesIreland
In The Last Decade
John E. Greer
44 papers receiving 814 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Health 246
- Neurology 237
- Education 294
- History and Philosophy of Science 42
- Developmental Neuroscience 31
Countries citing papers authored by John E. Greer
This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Greer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Greer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Greer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Greer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Greer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Greer. The network helps show where John E. Greer may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside John E. Greer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 129 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 73 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 64 | |
| 4 | 1999 | 64 | |
| 5 | 2012 | 58 | |
| 6 | 1991 | 54 | |
| 7 | 1990 | 47 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 9 | 2001 | 40 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 37 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 37 | |
| 12 | 1981 | 32 | |
| 13 | 1985 | 26 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 22 | |
| 15 | 1999 | 20 | |
| 16 | 1983 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 13 | |
| 19 | 1990 | 13 | |
| 20 | The persistence of religion: A study of adolescents in Northern Ireland. | 1980 | 9 |
About John E. Greer
John E. Greer is a scholar working on Education, Health, Sociology and Political Science, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 45 papers that have together received 934 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Education and Schools (23 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (18 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (10 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (6 papers), Religion and Society Interactions (6 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (6 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (5 papers) and Animal and Plant Science Education (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (246 citations), Neurology (237 citations), Education (294 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (42 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (31 citations). John E. Greer has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Leslie J. Francis, John T. Povlishock, Melissa J. McGinn, Anders Hånell, Kimberle M. Jacobs, Thomas M. Reeves, Linda L. Phillips, František Supek, Ľubica Supeková and Peter G. Schultz. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Religious Education, The Journal of Social Psychology, Research in Science & Technological Education, Personality and Individual Differences and Journal of Neuroscience.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.