John E. Fisk

75 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Peers

John E. Fisk
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
  • Toxicology 607
  • General Decision Sciences 154
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 801
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 480
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 460
Replace Robert E. Hicks with:
Robert E. Hicks United States
Scott D. Lane United States
Sara L. Simon United States
Jennifer Lorraine Stewart United States
Muriel D. Vogel-Sprott Canada
Karen D. Ersche United Kingdom
Peter Finn United States
Peter G. Rendell Australia
Michael T Amlung United States
Nicholas R. Burns Australia
John E. Fisk relative to Robert E. Hicks United States Robert E. Hicks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.1×
Robert E. Hicks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John E. Fisk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John E. Fisk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John E. Fisk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John E. Fisk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John E. Fisk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John E. Fisk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John E. Fisk. The network helps show where John E. Fisk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John E. Fisk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John E. Fisk Line = papers co-authored together John E. Fisk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 76 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004487
2 2006228
3 2009178
4 2000154
5 1996140
6 200395
7 200879
8 200568
9 201262
10 200458
11 201049
12 200948
13 200847
14 200247
15 200447
16 201140
17 201240
18 200936
19 200435
20 200435

About John E. Fisk

John E. Fisk is a scholar working on Toxicology, General Decision Sciences, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (27 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (19 papers), Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (14 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (12 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (10 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (8 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (7 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (607 citations), General Decision Sciences (154 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (801 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (480 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (460 citations). John E. Fisk has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Catharine Montgomery, Philip N. Murphy, James Hugo Smith-Spark, Michelle Wareing, Peter B. Warr, Gus A. Baker, Paul Rogers, Nick Pidgeon, Roderick I. Nicolson and Angela J. Fawcett. Their work appears in journals such as Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, Journal of Psychopharmacology, Psychopharmacology, British Journal of Psychology and Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact