Michelle Wareing
Impact in
- Toxicology top 2%
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Historical and Modern Theater Studies
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 15
-
- Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis 4
- Co-authors
- John E. Fisk (15 shared papers)Philip N. Murphy (17 shared papers)Catharine Montgomery (11 shared papers)Russell Newcombe (1 shared paper)Philip G. Erwin (1 shared paper)Derek T. Larkin (1 shared paper)Jim McVeigh (1 shared paper)Mark A Bellis (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental (6 papers)Psychopharmacology (2 papers)British Journal of Psychology (2 papers)Neuropsychobiology (1 paper)Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michelle Wareing
17 papers receiving 480 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
- Toxicology 99
- Clinical Psychology 389
- Cognitive Neuroscience 78
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 51
- Epidemiology 91
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle Wareing
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle Wareing's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle Wareing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle Wareing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle Wareing
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle Wareing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle Wareing. The network helps show where Michelle Wareing may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 13 scholars most cited alongside Michelle Wareing, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 153 | |
| 2 | 2004 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2004 | 47 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2004 | 35 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2007 | 23 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2006 | 17 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2018 | 2 | |
| 17 | Working memory de®cits in current and previous users of MDMA (`ecstasy') | 2000 | 1 |
| 18 | 2007 | 1 |
About Michelle Wareing
Michelle Wareing is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Toxicology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Epidemiology and Pharmacology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 505 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (15 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (4 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (3 papers), HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (2 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (1 paper) and Sleep and related disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (99 citations), Clinical Psychology (389 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (78 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (51 citations) and Epidemiology (91 citations). Michelle Wareing has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include John E. Fisk, Philip N. Murphy, Catharine Montgomery, Russell Newcombe, Philip G. Erwin, Derek T. Larkin, Jim McVeigh, Mark A Bellis, Lindsay C. Jones and Steve Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Human Psychopharmacology Clinical and Experimental, Psychopharmacology, British Journal of Psychology, Neuropsychobiology and Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.