John D. Gray

12 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

John D. Gray
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Biochemistry 43
  • Food Science 119
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 45
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 104
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 9
Replace Lewis A. Baker with:
Lewis A. Baker United Kingdom
Vlasta Mohaček‐Grošev Croatia
Erik Claeys Belgium
Irvin J. Levy United States
B. D. Sharma India
Ferdy S. Rondonuwu Indonesia
Yuhei Shimoyama Japan
R.G. Evelo Netherlands
F. Migliardo Italy
D. R. Hutton Australia
John D. Gray relative to Lewis A. Baker United Kingdom Lewis A. Baker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7×
Lewis A. Baker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John D. Gray

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John D. Gray's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John D. Gray with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John D. Gray more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John D. Gray

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John D. Gray. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John D. Gray. The network helps show where John D. Gray may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 24 scholars most cited alongside John D. Gray, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John D. Gray Line = papers co-authored together John D. Gray links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 1995109
2 195862
3 200761
4 199957
5 199746
6 195830
7 201222
8 199817
9 201417
10 201015
11 201315
12 201313

About John D. Gray

John D. Gray is a scholar working on Process Chemistry and Technology, Food Science, Biomedical Engineering, Molecular Biology and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Chemical Sensor Technologies (3 papers), Odor and Emission Control Technologies (3 papers), Horticultural and Viticultural Research (2 papers), Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry (2 papers), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (2 papers), Advanced Physical and Chemical Molecular Interactions (1 paper), Fermentation and Sensory Analysis (1 paper) and Atomic and Molecular Physics (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (43 citations), Food Science (119 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (45 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (104 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (9 citations). John D. Gray has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Bryan G. Coombe, F. A. Matsen, R. P. Hurst, Vaughan S. Langford, Patrick J. Williams, Murray J. McEwan, Patrick G. Iland, I. Leigh Francis, Peter Kolesik and Peter B. Høj. Their work appears in journals such as Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, Molecular Physics and The Journal of Chemical Physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact