John Crawford

2.0k citations
111 papers · 1.1k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

John Crawford

90 papers receiving 916 citations

Peers

John Crawford
Comparison fields: 5 of 140
  • Library and Information Sciences 166
  • Marketing 201
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 168
  • Internal Medicine 48
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 50
Replace Ellen Crumley with:
Ellen Crumley Canada
Kathleen Watson United States
Paul Lewis United Kingdom
Michael R. Bowers United States
James D. Wallace United States
David W. Harless United States
Roberta Sebastiani Italy
D. W. Farmer United States
Richard H. Franke United States
Melissa P. Johnston United States
John Crawford relative to Ellen Crumley Canada Ellen Crumley's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16.7×
Ellen Crumley · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Crawford

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Crawford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Crawford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Crawford more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Crawford

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Crawford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Crawford. The network helps show where John Crawford may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Crawford, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Crawford Line = papers co-authored together John Crawford links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008262
2 200566
3 198159
4 200952
5 198545
6 198231
7
National Guidelines for Digital Modelling
200931
8 201329
9 200528
10 201127
11 199123
12 198821
13 200719
14 200619
15 200418
16 196815
17 200514
18 198813
19 200413
20 201713

About John Crawford

John Crawford is a scholar working on Library and Information Sciences, Education, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Marketing, having authored 111 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (21 papers), Library Science and Administration (15 papers), Education Systems and Policy (9 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (6 papers), Irish and British Studies (5 papers), Web and Library Services (5 papers), Australian History and Society (5 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (166 citations), Marketing (201 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (168 citations), Internal Medicine (48 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (50 citations). John Crawford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include M. Greaves, Yen‐Lin Chee, Heather Watson, Charles W. Lamb, Stephen Teo, James R. Lumpkin, Charles Blankson, Richard Yu Yuan Hung, Peter Lok and Paul Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, Library Review, Journal of Educational Psychology, The Journal of Imperial & Commonwealth History and Journal of International Consumer Marketing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact