John Baxter

564 citations
8 papers · 376 · h-index 5

Impact in

Papers in

John Baxter

8 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

John Baxter
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 163
  • Education 307
  • Social Psychology 93
  • Geography, Planning and Development 20
  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27
Replace Joan Parker with:
Joan Parker United Kingdom
Kenneth J. Schoon United States
James P. Barufaldi United States
Aletta Zietsman South Africa
Filocha Haslam Australia
Ping-Kee Tao Hong Kong
Gökhan Özdemir Türkiye
Irini Skopeliti Greece
Mark Cosgrove Australia
Floyd H. Nordland United States
John Baxter relative to Joan Parker United Kingdom Joan Parker's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Joan Parker · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Baxter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Baxter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Baxter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Baxter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Baxter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Baxter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Baxter. The network helps show where John Baxter may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 9 scholars most cited alongside John Baxter, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Baxter Line = papers co-authored together John Baxter links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
#Work
1 1989269
2 200058
3 199120
4 199912
5 200010
6 20124
7
Observing Double Stars
20122
8
The National Curriculum - a Challenge for Astronomers
19911

About John Baxter

John Baxter is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Automotive Engineering and Social Psychology, having authored 8 papers that have together received 376 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History and Developments in Astronomy (4 papers), Science Education and Pedagogy (4 papers), Science Education and Perceptions (2 papers), Attention Economy in Education and Business (1 paper), Biofield Effects and Biophysics (1 paper), Evolution and Science Education (1 paper), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (1 paper) and Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (163 citations), Education (307 citations), Social Psychology (93 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (20 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (27 citations). John Baxter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Peter F. W. Preece, Federica Bianco, James D. Armstrong, Benjamin J. Fulton, J. P. Pye, R. M. Genet, Mark Brewer, Thomas C. Smith and J. I. Martinez. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Science Education, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Research in Science & Technological Education, Physics Education and CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact