Joanna Bates

2.5k citations
67 papers · 1.8k · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Joanna Bates

66 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Joanna Bates
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Family Practice 76
  • Emergency Medical Services 198
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 678
  • General Health Professions 363
  • Research and Theory 10
Replace Debra A. DaRosa with:
Debra A. DaRosa United States
Jane Kidd United Kingdom
Trevor Gibbs United Kingdom
Monica L. Lypson United States
Malathi Srinivasan United States
Sara Kim United States
Wendy C. Coates United States
Deepak Dath Canada
Jeanne M. Farnan United States
Kieran Walsh United Kingdom
Joanna Bates relative to Debra A. DaRosa United States Debra A. DaRosa's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Debra A. DaRosa · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Joanna Bates

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Joanna Bates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Joanna Bates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Joanna Bates more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Joanna Bates

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Joanna Bates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Joanna Bates. The network helps show where Joanna Bates may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Joanna Bates, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Joanna Bates Line = papers co-authored together Joanna Bates links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013116
2 2016111
3 201696
4 200495
5 200789
6 200384
7 201863
8
A physician peer support writing group.
200363
9 201463
10 200161
11 200656
12 201750
13 200548
14 201742
15 200539
16 202134
17 200834
18 201632
19 201131
20 201130

About Joanna Bates

Joanna Bates is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Gender Studies, having authored 67 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (15 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (12 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (9 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (6 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (5 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (5 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (4 papers) and Medical Education and Admissions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (76 citations), Emergency Medical Services (198 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (678 citations), General Health Professions (363 citations) and Research and Theory (10 citations). Joanna Bates has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Rachel Ellaway, Scott A. Lear, David Snadden, Francis Lau, Andrew Ignaszewski, Jill Konkin, Brett Schrewe, Pim W. Teunissen, Christopher Watling and Sarah Dobson. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, Academic Medicine, Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, Medical Teacher and Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact