Countries where authors publish in The Review of English Studies
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in The Review of English Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in The Review of English Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Review of English Studies more than expected).
Fields of papers published in The Review of English Studies
This network shows the impact of papers published in The Review of English Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in The Review of English Studies.
About The Review of English Studies
The 1.6k papers published in The Review of English Studies in the last decades have received a total of 4.2k indexed citations . Papers published in The Review of English Studies usually cover Classics (912 papers), Literature and Literary Theory (773 papers), History (338 papers), Language and Linguistics (111 papers) and Music (18 papers) specifically the topics of Renaissance Literature and Culture (588 papers), Medieval Literature and History (369 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (259 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (223 papers), Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books (215 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (150 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (128 papers) and Modernist Literature and Criticism (94 papers). The most active scholars publishing in The Review of English Studies are Lucy Newlyn, Thorlac Turville‐Petre, Elaine M. Treharne, Katherine Duncan‐Jönes, Kathryn Sutherland, David C. Hopkins, Nicholas von Maltzahn, Edward Wilson, Robert D. Hume and Elizabeth Muir Tyler.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.