Jo Briggs

652 citations
42 papers · 451 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jo Briggs

39 papers receiving 431 citations

Peers

Jo Briggs
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Human-Computer Interaction 158
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 54
  • Computer Science Applications 37
  • Museology 20
  • Management Information Systems 44
Replace Seyram Avle with:
Seyram Avle United States
Matthias Korn United States
Joan Greenbaum United States
Meg Young United States
Christina Mörtberg Sweden
Marisa Leavitt Cohn Denmark
Jenny Kennedy Australia
Juliane Jarke Germany
Michaelanne Dye United States
Mads Bødker Denmark
Jo Briggs relative to Seyram Avle United States Seyram Avle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Seyram Avle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jo Briggs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jo Briggs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jo Briggs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jo Briggs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jo Briggs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jo Briggs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jo Briggs. The network helps show where Jo Briggs may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jo Briggs, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jo Briggs Line = papers co-authored together Jo Briggs links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201894
2 201942
3 201842
4 201634
5
202233
6 201732
7 201730
8 201919
9 201415
10 20229
11 20238
12 20228
13 20187
14 20127
15 20166
16 20136
17
T-Shifting Identities and Practices: Interaction Designers in the Fourth Industrial Age
20205
18 20165
19 20235
20
Identity Management in the Age of Blockchain 3.0
20184

About Jo Briggs

Jo Briggs is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies, Information Systems and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 42 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (17 papers), Privacy, Security, and Data Protection (7 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (4 papers), Persona Design and Applications (4 papers), Blockchain Technology Applications and Security (3 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (3 papers) and ICT in Developing Communities (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (158 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (54 citations), Computer Science Applications (37 citations), Museology (20 citations) and Management Information Systems (44 citations). Jo Briggs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include John Vines, Ann Light, Rachel Clarke, Emma Flynn, Chris Speed, Mike Harding, Chris Elsden, Andrea Armstrong, Mark Blythe and Pete Wright. Their work appears in journals such as CoDesign, Local Government Studies, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Qualitative Research and Oxford Art Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact