Qualitative Research

1.1k papers and 49.3k indexed citations

About

The 1.1k papers published in Qualitative Research in the last decades have received a total of 49.3k indexed citations. Papers published in Qualitative Research usually cover Sociology and Political Science (816 papers), General Health Professions (163 papers) and Education (160 papers) specifically the topics of Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (484 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (345 papers) and Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods (117 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Qualitative Research are Glenn A. Bowen, Alan Bryman, Roni Berger, Linda Finlay, Norman K. Denzin, Michelle O’Reilly, Nicola Parker, Anna Bagnoli, Judith E. Sturges and Kathleen J. Hanrahan.

In The Last Decade

Qualitative Research

970 papers receiving 45.7k citations

Fields of papers published in Qualitative Research

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Qualitative Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Qualitative Research.

Countries where authors publish in Qualitative Research

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Qualitative Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Qualitative Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qualitative Research more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026