Jemima Whyte
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 5%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
-
- Animal Genetics and Reproduction
- Genetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Papers in
-
- Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer 2
- CRISPR and Genetic Engineering 2
- Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer 1
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Jill A. Helms (2 shared papers)Andrew A. Smith (2 shared papers)G. O. Aspinall (1 shared paper)Lorna Taylor (2 shared papers)James D. Glover (2 shared papers)Joanna Brzeszczyńska (2 shared papers)Adrian Sherman (1 shared paper)Michael J. McGrew (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Transgenic Research (1 paper)Stem Cell Research (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Carbohydrate Research (1 paper)Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jemima Whyte
6 papers receiving 496 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Rehabilitation 66
- Genetics 152
- Molecular Biology 295
- Genetics 32
- Food Science 54
Countries citing papers authored by Jemima Whyte
This map shows the geographic impact of Jemima Whyte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jemima Whyte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jemima Whyte more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jemima Whyte
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jemima Whyte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jemima Whyte. The network helps show where Jemima Whyte may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 21 scholars most cited alongside Jemima Whyte, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2012 | 206 | |
| 2 | 2015 | 154 | |
| 3 | 1968 | 84 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 54 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 18 | |
| 6 | Culturing avian primordial germ cells and novel transposon vectors for transgenesis | 2014 | 2 |
About Jemima Whyte
Jemima Whyte is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Rehabilitation, Genetics, Genetics and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 6 papers that have together received 518 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Genetics and Reproduction (2 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (2 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (2 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (2 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (1 paper), Proteoglycans and glycosaminoglycans research (1 paper), Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (1 paper) and Mesenchymal stem cell research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (66 citations), Genetics (152 citations), Molecular Biology (295 citations), Genetics (32 citations) and Food Science (54 citations). Jemima Whyte has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Jill A. Helms, Andrew A. Smith, G. O. Aspinall, Lorna Taylor, James D. Glover, Joanna Brzeszczyńska, Adrian Sherman, Michael J. McGrew, Pete Kaiser and Mark Woodcock. Their work appears in journals such as Transgenic Research, Stem Cell Research, PLoS ONE, Carbohydrate Research and Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.