Countries where authors publish in Stem Cell Research
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Stem Cell Research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Stem Cell Research with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stem Cell Research more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Stem Cell Research. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Stem Cell Research.
About Stem Cell Research
The 3.1k papers published in Stem Cell Research in the last decades have received a total of 43.3k indexed citations . Papers published in Stem Cell Research usually cover Molecular Biology (2.4k papers), Developmental Neuroscience (135 papers), Genetics (340 papers), Aging (46 papers) and Genetics (523 papers) specifically the topics of Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (1.5k papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (1.1k papers), Renal and related cancers (318 papers), Congenital heart defects research (206 papers), Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine (185 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (182 papers), 3D Printing in Biomedical Research (148 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (147 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Stem Cell Research are Andre Choo, Gerard Pasterkamp, Sai Kiang Lim, Fatih Arslan, Leo Timmers, Ruenn Chai Lai, Dominique P.V. de Kleijn, Chuen Neng Lee, Reida El Oakley and Christine L. Mummery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.