Jeannie Wright

703 citations
35 papers · 509 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Jeannie Wright

34 papers receiving 446 citations

Peers

Jeannie Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Conservation 71
  • Applied Psychology 76
  • Social Psychology 205
  • Clinical Psychology 175
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 59
Replace Ernesto Spinelli with:
Ernesto Spinelli United Kingdom
Gerald Parr United States
Kathy Evans United States
Hongryun Woo United States
Richard Q. Shin United States
Tobin Hart United States
Diego Romaioli Italy
David Wallace United States
Ruth E. Ray United States
Reinekke Lengelle Canada
Jeannie Wright relative to Ernesto Spinelli United Kingdom Ernesto Spinelli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.5×
Ernesto Spinelli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jeannie Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jeannie Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jeannie Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jeannie Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jeannie Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jeannie Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jeannie Wright. The network helps show where Jeannie Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Jeannie Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jeannie Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jeannie Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200198
2 201164
3
Writing Cures: An Introductory Handbook of Writing in Counselling and Therapy
200462
4 200261
5 200738
6 200832
7 201021
8 200717
9 200414
10 201813
11 20059
12 20098
13 20118
14 20058
15 20187
16 20037
17 20206
18 20035
19 20184
20 20044

About Jeannie Wright

Jeannie Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Conservation, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (12 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (11 papers), Mental Health via Writing (7 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (7 papers), Reflective Practices in Education (4 papers), Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (71 citations), Applied Psychology (76 citations), Social Psychology (205 citations), Clinical Psychology (175 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (59 citations). Jeannie Wright has collaborated with scholars based in New Zealand, United Kingdom and Malta. Frequent co-authors include Man Cheung Chung, Seth Brown, Cat Pausé, Liz Sutton, Michael Townend, Frances Griffiths, Sue Cornforth, Ravi K. Thiara, Elizabeth Harrison and Jonathan Wyatt. Their work appears in journals such as Reflective Practice, Qualitative Inquiry, Emotion, space and society, Higher Education Research & Development and Counselling Psychology Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact