Reflective Practice

1.2k papers and 14.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.2k papers published in Reflective Practice in the last decades have received a total of 14.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Reflective Practice usually cover Education (902 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (176 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (151 papers) specifically the topics of Reflective Practices in Education (692 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (338 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (132 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Reflective Practice are Barbara Larrivee, Catherine Beauchamp, Karran Thorpe, Margaretha Ekebergh, Tom Russell, Jan Pascal, Neil Thompson, Helen Hickson, Valerie Hobbs and Werner Ulrich.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Reflective Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Reflective Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Reflective Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Reflective Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Reflective Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Reflective Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reflective Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025