Counselling Psychology Quarterly

1.1k papers and 13.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 13.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly usually cover Clinical Psychology (772 papers), Social Psychology (612 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (145 papers) specifically the topics of Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (344 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (305 papers) and Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (212 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Counselling Psychology Quarterly are Christine J. Yeh, Cathy Kelleher, Tony Cassidy, Luo Lu, Katie Baird, Amanda Kracen, Stephen P. Lewis, Kim Etherington, Robert A. Neimeyer and Rachel Tribe.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Counselling Psychology Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Counselling Psychology Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Counselling Psychology Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025