Jaye Johnson Thiel

458 citations
28 papers · 318 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jaye Johnson Thiel

26 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers

Jaye Johnson Thiel
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Literature and Literary Theory 136
  • Cultural Studies 84
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 32
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 13
  • Education 138
Replace Alexandra Lasczik with:
Alexandra Lasczik Australia
Celia Fernández Prieto
Anton Franks United Kingdom
S. R. Toliver United States
Joy S. Ritchie
Debbie Sonu United States
Barbara Bickel United States
Miriam Giugni Australia
Wanda Brooks United States
Donna Kalmbach Phillips United States
Jaye Johnson Thiel relative to Alexandra Lasczik Australia Alexandra Lasczik's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Alexandra Lasczik · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jaye Johnson Thiel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jaye Johnson Thiel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jaye Johnson Thiel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jaye Johnson Thiel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jaye Johnson Thiel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jaye Johnson Thiel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jaye Johnson Thiel. The network helps show where Jaye Johnson Thiel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Jaye Johnson Thiel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jaye Johnson Thiel Line = papers co-authored together Jaye Johnson Thiel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201854
2 201647
3 201537
4 201732
5 202026
6 202024
7 201917
8 201514
9 201511
10 19708
11 20187
12 20196
13 20185
14 20233
15 20213
16 20203
17 20233
18 20173
19 20222
20 20192

About Jaye Johnson Thiel

Jaye Johnson Thiel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Education, Literature and Literary Theory and Philosophy, having authored 28 papers that have together received 318 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Posthumanist Ethics and Activism (10 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (9 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (5 papers), Children's Rights and Participation (5 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (5 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Art Education and Development (3 papers) and Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (136 citations), Cultural Studies (84 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (32 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (13 citations) and Education (138 citations). Jaye Johnson Thiel has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Candace R. Kuby, Angie Zapata, Stephanie Jones, Stephanie Jones, Karen E. Wohlwend, Mark D. Vagle, Kimberly Lenters and Barbara Comber. Their work appears in journals such as Qualitative Inquiry, Journal of Literacy Research, Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, Literacy and Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact