Jay M. Griffith

1.7k citations
19 papers · 1.5k · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Jay M. Griffith

19 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Jay M. Griffith
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 544
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 306
  • Biological Psychiatry 50
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 352
  • Molecular Biology 613
Replace M. Waldo with:
M. Waldo United States
Lawrence E. Adler United States
A.F.T. Arnsten United States
G J Wang United States
Yoshifumi Koshino Japan
Harry Vilkman Finland
Beth L. Murphy United States
Robert G. Bota United States
Ralph Esposito United States
John Gatley United States
Jay M. Griffith relative to M. Waldo United States M. Waldo's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
M. Waldo · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jay M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jay M. Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jay M. Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jay M. Griffith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jay M. Griffith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jay M. Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jay M. Griffith. The network helps show where Jay M. Griffith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jay M. Griffith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jay M. Griffith Line = papers co-authored together Jay M. Griffith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 1992373
2 1994194
3 1993191
4 1996180
5 1991154
6 199996
7 199891
8 200854
9 199549
10 199131
11 199930
12 199329
13 199528
14 198415
15 199913
16 19939
17 20082
18 20081
19 19961

About Jay M. Griffith

Jay M. Griffith is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental health, Molecular Biology, Biological Psychiatry and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Music Perception (10 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (4 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (544 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (306 citations), Biological Psychiatry (50 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (352 citations) and Molecular Biology (613 citations). Jay M. Griffith has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence E. Adler, Robert Freedman, Merilyne C. Waldo, Herbert T. Nagamoto, Lee Hoffer, Kara A. McRae, Josette G. Harris, C. Munro Cullum, David A. Young and Robert R. Freedman. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, Schizophrenia Research, Psychiatry Research, Neuropsychobiology and Harvard Review of Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact