Jasmine Luk

747 citations
18 papers · 437 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Jasmine Luk

17 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers

Jasmine Luk
Comparison fields: 5 of 35
  • Linguistics and Language 132
  • Language and Linguistics 262
  • Literature and Literary Theory 218
  • Speech and Hearing 38
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 58
Replace Yumi Matsumoto with:
Yumi Matsumoto United States
Angelica Galante Canada
Hiram H. Maxim United States
Geoff Hall United Kingdom
Koen Van Gorp Belgium
Ian Cushing United Kingdom
Anton Franks United Kingdom
Josef Hellebrandt United States
İsmail Çakır Türkiye
Jane Zuengler United States
Jasmine Luk relative to Yumi Matsumoto United States Yumi Matsumoto's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Yumi Matsumoto · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jasmine Luk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jasmine Luk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jasmine Luk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jasmine Luk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jasmine Luk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jasmine Luk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jasmine Luk. The network helps show where Jasmine Luk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jasmine Luk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jasmine Luk Line = papers co-authored together Jasmine Luk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2016100
2 201258
3 199756
4 201448
5 199829
6 200828
7 201328
8 201026
9 200220
10 200411
11 201410
12 20176
13 20094
14 20094
15 20134
16 20163
17
Differentiating speech accents and pronunciation errors: perceptions of TESOL professionals in Hong Kong
20102
18
Hong Kong's New Senior Secondary (NSS) English Language Curriculum: Perspectives from Corpus Linguistics
20100

About Jasmine Luk

Jasmine Luk is a scholar working on Language and Linguistics, Literature and Literary Theory, Linguistics and Language, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Education, having authored 18 papers that have together received 437 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (12 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (8 papers), Multilingual Education and Policy (7 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (4 papers), Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (3 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (2 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (2 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (132 citations), Language and Linguistics (262 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (218 citations), Speech and Hearing (38 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (58 citations). Jasmine Luk has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong and China. Frequent co-authors include Lianjiang Jiang, Angel M. Y. Lin, Steve Tauroza, Ruth Wong, Diane Hui, Bronson Hui and Ying Zhan. Their work appears in journals such as System, Language Culture and Curriculum, TESOL Quarterly, RELC Journal and Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact