Jan-Peter Herbst

682 citations
44 papers · 210 · h-index 8

Impact in

  • Music top 1%
    • Music History and Culture
    • Diverse Musicological Studies
    • Musicology and Musical Analysis
    • Diverse Music Education Insights
    • Cultural Industries and Urban Development

Papers in

Jan-Peter Herbst

38 papers receiving 187 citations

Peers

Jan-Peter Herbst
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Music 130
  • Urban Studies 31
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 90
  • Museology 10
  • Archeology 3
Replace David W. Bernstein with:
David W. Bernstein United States
Albin J. Zak United States
Justin A. Williams United Kingdom
David Horn United Kingdom
Gunther Schuller
Kyle Adams United States
Anthony Baines
Patrizia Lombardo Switzerland
Judy Lochhead United States
Stephen Walsh United Kingdom
Jan-Peter Herbst relative to David W. Bernstein United States David W. Bernstein's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×34×
David W. Bernstein · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan-Peter Herbst

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan-Peter Herbst's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan-Peter Herbst with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan-Peter Herbst more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan-Peter Herbst

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan-Peter Herbst. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan-Peter Herbst. The network helps show where Jan-Peter Herbst may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Jan-Peter Herbst, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan-Peter Herbst Line = papers co-authored together Jan-Peter Herbst links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201131
2 201720
3 201816
4 201911
5 201911
6 201810
7 20039
8 20227
9 20217
10 20177
11 20206
12 20226
13 20215
14 20215
15 20205
16 20215
17 20195
18 20214
19 20204
20 20234

About Jan-Peter Herbst

Jan-Peter Herbst is a scholar working on Music, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Urban Studies, Sociology and Political Science and Signal Processing, having authored 44 papers that have together received 210 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Music History and Culture (28 papers), Music Technology and Sound Studies (23 papers), Diverse Musicological Studies (21 papers), Musicology and Musical Analysis (7 papers), Cultural Industries and Urban Development (6 papers), Music and Audio Processing (5 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (4 papers) and Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (130 citations), Urban Studies (31 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (90 citations), Museology (10 citations) and Archeology (3 citations). Jan-Peter Herbst has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Bryce D. Smith, Gary Uhl, Patricia L. Jones, Jennifer Galbraith, H. Fisher, Christoph Reuter, Thomas Thurnell‐Read, David Robinson, Karl Spracklen and Moritz Baßler. Their work appears in journals such as Popular Music & Society, Music Perception An Interdisciplinary Journal, Creative Industries Journal, Mobilities and Popular Music.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact