Anna Seidel

412 citations
28 papers · 172 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Anna Seidel

19 papers receiving 82 citations

Peers

Anna Seidel
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
  • Cultural Studies 68
  • Sociology and Political Science 138
  • Anthropology 26
  • History and Philosophy of Science 11
  • Religious studies 9
Replace James M. Hargett with:
James M. Hargett United States
Philip Clart Germany
Tze-ki Hon United States
Alphonse Dupront France
Frank A. Kierman
Robert L. Paquette United States
Mavis C. Campbell United States
Alejandra Bronfman United States
Luís Nicolau Parés Brazil
Monique Allewaert United States
Anna Seidel relative to James M. Hargett United States James M. Hargett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
James M. Hargett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Seidel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Seidel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Seidel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Seidel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Seidel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Seidel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Seidel. The network helps show where Anna Seidel may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 11 scholars most cited alongside Anna Seidel, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anna Seidel Line = papers co-authored together Anna Seidel links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196928
2 198026
3 198319
4 198918
5 196713
6 202312
7 198110
8 19849
9 19828
10 19795
11 19785
12 19783
13
Répertoire du canon bouddhique sino-japonais, édition de Taishō (Taishō shinshū daizōkyō)
19783
14 20223
15
Taoismus : die inoffizielle Hochreligion Chinas
19892
16 19782
17
Max Kaltenmark: A Bibliography
19881
18 20221
19 19951
20 20081

About Anna Seidel

Anna Seidel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Philosophy and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 28 papers that have together received 172 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (15 papers), Japanese History and Culture (5 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Agriculture and Rural Development Research (2 papers), Polish Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Central European Literary Studies (2 papers), Polish-Jewish Holocaust Memory Studies (2 papers) and German History and Society (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (68 citations), Sociology and Political Science (138 citations), Anthropology (26 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (11 citations) and Religious studies (9 citations). Anna Seidel has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Holmes Welch, Derk Bodde, John S. Major, Regina Birner, Thomas Daum, Daniel L. Overmyer, Paul Demiéville, Ellen Chen, Jan-Peter Herbst and Moritz Baßler. Their work appears in journals such as Numen, History of Religions, The American Historical Review, Pacific Affairs and Experimental Agriculture.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact