Countries where authors publish in Creative Industries Journal
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Creative Industries Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Creative Industries Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Creative Industries Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Creative Industries Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in Creative Industries Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Creative Industries Journal.
About Creative Industries Journal
The 306 papers published in Creative Industries Journal in the last decades have received a total of 2.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Creative Industries Journal usually cover Urban Studies (171 papers), Music (27 papers), Museology (13 papers), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (25 papers) and Marketing (18 papers) specifically the topics of Cultural Industries and Urban Development (170 papers), Music History and Culture (24 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (22 papers), Copyright and Intellectual Property (13 papers), Digital Games and Media (12 papers), Media and Digital Communication (11 papers), Artistic and Creative Research (11 papers) and Asian Culture and Media Studies (10 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Creative Industries Journal are Jo Foord, Lee Marshall, Susan Bagwell, Devon Powers, Stuart Cunningham, Jeremy Wade Morris, Peter L. Higgs, Oluwayemisi Adebola Abisuga, Roberta Comunian and Ryan Daniel.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.