Janice Smith
Impact in
- Cancer Research top 5%
- Family Practice top 5%
Papers in
-
- Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms 5
- Genetics 24
- Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities 18
- Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders 4
- Co-authors
- Ulrike Stein (16 shared papers)Peter M. Schlag (7 shared papers)Wolfgang Walther (10 shared papers)Franziska Arlt (4 shared papers)Walter Birchmeier (2 shared papers)Iduna Fichtner (4 shared papers)Holger Schwabe (1 shared paper)Murray D. Norris (8 shared papers)
- Journals
- Cancer Research (5 papers)Oncogene (3 papers)Prenatal Diagnosis (2 papers)Human Genetics (2 papers)Journal of Counseling & Development (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyAustralia
In The Last Decade
Janice Smith
64 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
- Cancer Research 349
- Family Practice 36
- Oncology 520
- Genetics 467
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 282
Countries citing papers authored by Janice Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Smith. The network helps show where Janice Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 400 | |
| 2 | 2006 | 187 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 183 | |
| 4 | 2006 | 130 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 128 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 105 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 94 | |
| 8 | 2009 | 87 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 83 | |
| 10 | 2011 | 76 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 71 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 63 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 60 | |
| 14 | 2015 | 57 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 16 | 2012 | 44 | |
| 17 | 1985 | 44 | |
| 18 | 2014 | 33 | |
| 19 | 2016 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2013 | 30 |
About Janice Smith
Janice Smith is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Neurology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine, having authored 67 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (18 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (12 papers), Neuroblastoma Research and Treatments (8 papers), Chromosomal and Genetic Variations (6 papers), Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (5 papers), Liver physiology and pathology (4 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (4 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cancer Research (349 citations), Family Practice (36 citations), Oncology (520 citations), Genetics (467 citations) and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (282 citations). Janice Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Ulrike Stein, Peter M. Schlag, Wolfgang Walther, Franziska Arlt, Walter Birchmeier, Iduna Fichtner, Holger Schwabe, Murray D. Norris, Glenn M. Marshall and Michelle Haber. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer Research, Oncogene, Prenatal Diagnosis, Human Genetics and Journal of Counseling & Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.