Jane Robinson

1.9k citations
65 papers · 1.4k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Robinson

63 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Jane Robinson
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
  • Research and Theory 63
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 38
  • General Health Professions 279
  • Language and Linguistics 112
  • Dermatology 75
Replace Sylvie Dubois with:
Sylvie Dubois Canada
Constance Johnson United States
Miyoung Kim South Korea
Amanda Bolderston Canada
Sören Huwendiek Switzerland
Soyoung Yu South Korea
Stephen Merry United States
Ruth Wong United Kingdom
Fiona Ross United Kingdom
Sally Okun United States
Jane Robinson relative to Sylvie Dubois Canada Sylvie Dubois's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×2.9×
Sylvie Dubois · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Robinson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Robinson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Robinson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Robinson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Robinson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Robinson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Robinson. The network helps show where Jane Robinson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Robinson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Robinson Line = papers co-authored together Jane Robinson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 65 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007237
2 1970135
3 201597
4
The NHS under new management.
199090
5 198286
6 200162
7 199355
8 200052
9 199246
10 200740
11
Health Needs Assessment: Theory and Practice
199639
12 199938
13 199433
14 200726
15 200024
16 200123
17 200023
18 197019
19 200018
20 198218

About Jane Robinson

Jane Robinson is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Artificial Intelligence, Language and Linguistics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Issues, ethics and legal aspects, having authored 65 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (9 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation (6 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (3 papers), Topic Modeling (3 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Healthcare Systems and Challenges (3 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (63 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (38 citations), General Health Professions (279 citations), Language and Linguistics (112 citations) and Dermatology (75 citations). Jane Robinson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Heather Wharrad, Ruth Elkan, Philip Strong, Mitch Blair, Linda East, Glenna Spitze, John Logan, Chris Bird, Stephen Poole and Meenu Wadhwa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, International Nursing Review, International Journal of Nursing Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing and Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact