David Williams

231 papers receiving 5.4k citations

Peers

David Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 173
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 295
  • Rehabilitation 454
  • Emergency Medical Services 389
  • Family Practice 97
  • Toxicology 143
Replace David K. Blough with:
David K. Blough United States
Elbert S. Huang United States
Barbara Farrell Canada
Michael J. Klag United States
William B. Stason United States
Mark J. Eisenberg Canada
Andreas Laupacis Canada
Vlado Perkovic Australia
Saif S. Rathore United States
Anthonius de Boer Netherlands
David Williams relative to David K. Blough United States David K. Blough's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
David K. Blough · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Williams. The network helps show where David Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Williams, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Williams Line = papers co-authored together David Williams links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 247 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2002320
2 2019165
3 2015162
4 2014148
5 2012125
6 2011125
7 2007121
8 2006113
9 2016104
10 201296
11 201190
12 200187
13 201384
14 200184
15 200382
16 201179
17 199277
18 200576
19 199965
20 201062

About David Williams

David Williams is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Rehabilitation and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 247 papers that have together received 5.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (45 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (20 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (14 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (12 papers), Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions (11 papers), Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes (10 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (7 papers) and Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (295 citations), Rehabilitation (454 citations), Emergency Medical Services (389 citations), Family Practice (97 citations) and Toxicology (143 citations). David Williams has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include J. Feely, Anne Hickey, Kathleen Bennett, Cora McGreevy, Lisa Mellon, Frances Horgan, Linda Brewer, Colin R Simpson, Daniela Rohde and Eamon Dolan. Their work appears in journals such as Stroke, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Age and Ageing and European Stroke Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact