Robert T. Moore

2.1k citations
60 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Robert T. Moore

52 papers receiving 911 citations

Peers

Robert T. Moore
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Ecological Modeling 67
  • Artificial Intelligence 469
  • Mathematical Physics 116
  • Algebra and Number Theory 52
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 93
Replace Ellen Baake with:
Ellen Baake Germany
Richard A. Blythe United Kingdom
Simone Pigolotti Japan
Helmut Länger Austria
Tom Leinster United Kingdom
G. Cocho Mexico
Joe Repka Canada
Sergio A. Cannas Argentina
Alisa Bokulich United States
Steven French United Kingdom
Robert T. Moore relative to Ellen Baake Germany Ellen Baake's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.4×
Ellen Baake · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Robert T. Moore

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Robert T. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert T. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert T. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Robert T. Moore

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert T. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert T. Moore. The network helps show where Robert T. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Robert T. Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Robert T. Moore Line = papers co-authored together Robert T. Moore links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 60 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1951152
2 198294
3 199386
4
Possible-world semantics for autoepistemic logic
198760
5 199958
6 200857
7 199355
8 198449
9 198740
10 198439
11 199137
12 196835
13 199426
14 196926
15 198323
16 198917
17 198216
18 199116
19 195915
20 202215

About Robert T. Moore

Robert T. Moore is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications and Ecology, having authored 60 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Natural Language Processing Techniques (15 papers), Topic Modeling (10 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), Advanced Operator Algebra Research (6 papers), Matrix Theory and Algorithms (5 papers), Advanced Topics in Algebra (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (4 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (67 citations), Artificial Intelligence (469 citations), Mathematical Physics (116 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (52 citations) and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (93 citations). Robert T. Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Robin M. Hochstrasser, John Dowding, Edwin J. Heilweil, Fuad E. Doany, Ludlow Griscom, Herbert Friedmann, Jean Mark Gawron, John Bear, Palle E. T. Jørgensen and Lynn Cherny. Their work appears in journals such as Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, Ornithological Applications, The Journal of Chemical Physics, eNeuro and Economic Inquiry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact