Jane Hubert

650 citations
12 papers · 516 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Hubert

11 papers receiving 499 citations

Peers

Jane Hubert
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Biochemistry 140
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 90
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 61
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 104
  • Molecular Biology 235
Replace Ananya Rana with:
Ananya Rana India
Cecilia A. Svelander Sweden
Rolf Grossklaus Germany
Caterina Dell’Aquila United Kingdom
Velitchka V. Mihaleva Netherlands
Ana Beatriz Zanqui Brazil
George F.M. Ball United Kingdom
Esther Campos-Giménez Switzerland
Ebru Aydın Türkiye
Noelia López-Gutiérrez Spain
Jane Hubert relative to Ananya Rana India Ananya Rana's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×5.2×
Ananya Rana · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Hubert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Hubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Hubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Hubert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Hubert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Hubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Hubert. The network helps show where Jane Hubert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Hubert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Hubert Line = papers co-authored together Jane Hubert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2009175
2 2013136
3 2010134
4 201539
5 20228
6 20057
7 20245
8 20244
9 20233
10 20243
11 20221
12 20231

About Jane Hubert

Jane Hubert is a scholar working on Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Molecular Biology and Filtration and Separation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (2 papers), Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis (2 papers), Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies (2 papers), Tea Polyphenols and Effects (2 papers), Phytoestrogen effects and research (2 papers), Phytochemistry and Biological Activities (2 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (1 paper) and Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (140 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (90 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (61 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (104 citations) and Molecular Biology (235 citations). Jane Hubert has collaborated with scholars based in France, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Augustin Scalbert, Claudine Manach, Rafaël Llorach, Jara Pérez‐Jiménez, Lee Hooper, Gary Williamson, Aedín Cassidy, Estelle Pujos‐Guillot, Catherine Bennetau‐Pelissero and Bernard Lyan. Their work appears in journals such as Molecules, Biomolecules, Applied Sciences, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Journal of Food Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact