Jane Harden

1.1k citations
33 papers · 747 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Harden

29 papers receiving 709 citations

Peers

Jane Harden
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Hardware and Architecture 217
  • Research and Theory 15
  • Computer Networks and Communications 348
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 8
  • Media Technology 47
Replace Thomas H. Greer with:
Thomas H. Greer United States
Mark McMahon Australia
Jacob A Andrews United Kingdom
Elaine Ball United Kingdom
T. Lehman United States
James H. Rogers United States
Haijun Cao China
Peter Roessler Austria
Gawon Kim South Korea
Hyosu Kim South Korea
Jane Harden relative to Thomas H. Greer United States Thomas H. Greer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.8×
Thomas H. Greer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Harden

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Harden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Harden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Harden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Harden

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Harden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Harden. The network helps show where Jane Harden may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Harden, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Harden Line = papers co-authored together Jane Harden links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1991318
2 200455
3 199654
4 201932
5 198828
6 201827
7 200025
8 201724
9 200621
10 200418
11 200815
12 201915
13 200215
14 202112
15 201712
16 201911
17 201711
18 20229
19 20058
20 20208

About Jane Harden

Jane Harden is a scholar working on Hardware and Architecture, General Health Professions, Computer Networks and Communications, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 33 papers that have together received 747 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques (6 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (3 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (3 papers), VLSI and FPGA Design Techniques (3 papers), VLSI and Analog Circuit Testing (3 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (3 papers), Software System Performance and Reliability (2 papers) and Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Hardware and Architecture (217 citations), Research and Theory (15 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (348 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (8 citations) and Media Technology (47 citations). Jane Harden has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include D.H. Linder, Clare Bennett, J.W. Bruce, Deborah Edwards, Sally Anstey, Judith Carrier, Katie Featherstone, Veronica Swallow, Charlotte Clarke and Donna Reese. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Sex Education, Nurse Education Today, IEEE Transactions on Computers and Proceedings of the IEEE.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact