Jan Reed

84 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Jan Reed
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Research and Theory 93
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 99
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 53
  • General Health Professions 953
  • Demography 197
Replace Charlotte Clarke with:
Charlotte Clarke United Kingdom
Jan Dewing United Kingdom
Linda R. Phillips United States
Les Todres United Kingdom
Norma J. Stewart Canada
Jennifer Baumbusch Canada
Gordon Grant United Kingdom
Adeline Cooney Ireland
Carol M. Musil United States
Joan K. Magilvy United States
Jan Reed relative to Charlotte Clarke United Kingdom Charlotte Clarke's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Charlotte Clarke · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Reed. The network helps show where Jan Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Reed, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Reed Line = papers co-authored together Jan Reed links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 89 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997164
2
Appreciative Inquiry: Research for Change
2006148
3 2007113
4 199690
5 200587
6
Nurse Education: A Reflective Approach
199369
7 199564
8 200262
9 199953
10
My Home Life: Quality of Life in Care Homes
200647
11 199644
12 200344
13 200434
14 199632
15 199830
16 199230
17 198430
18 199429
19 199728
20 200828

About Jan Reed

Jan Reed is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education, Sociology and Political Science, Demography and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 89 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (27 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (11 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (11 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (9 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (8 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (8 papers), Appreciative Inquiry and Organizational Change (8 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (93 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (99 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (53 citations), General Health Professions (953 citations) and Demography (197 citations). Jan Reed has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Russia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Valerie Roskell Payton, Glenda Cook, J. E. Cotes, Susan Procter, Debra Morgan, Charlotte Clarke, D. J. Chinn, David Stanley, Brendan McCormack and Senga Bond. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Ageing and Society, Health & Social Care in the Community and International Journal of Older People Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact