Jane E. Haley

4.0k citations
38 papers · 3.1k · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Jane E. Haley

38 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Jane E. Haley
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 1.5k
  • Transplantation 160
  • Physiology 1.4k
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 260
  • Neurology 226
Replace Doo‐Sup Choi with:
Doo‐Sup Choi United States
Elisabetta Coppi Italy
Seitaro Ohkuma Japan
Anna Maria Pugliese Italy
G R Uhl United States
Gareth W. Roberts United Kingdom
Lisa Walter Germany
Albert Sattin United States
Christian Stumpf Germany
Hai‐Ying Shen United States
Jane E. Haley relative to Doo‐Sup Choi United States Doo‐Sup Choi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Doo‐Sup Choi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Haley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Haley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Haley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Haley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Haley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Haley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Haley. The network helps show where Jane E. Haley may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Haley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane E. Haley Line = papers co-authored together Jane E. Haley links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1990419
2 1992418
3 1992276
4 1992256
5 1992222
6 1994202
7 1998106
8 199389
9 200287
10 199782
11 199780
12 200575
13 199874
14 199868
15 200068
16 198968
17 200366
18 199458
19 200552
20 199050

About Jane E. Haley

Jane E. Haley is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Surgery, having authored 38 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (12 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (10 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (7 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (6 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (3 papers), Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (3 papers) and Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (1.5k citations), Transplantation (160 citations), Physiology (1.4k citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (260 citations) and Neurology (226 citations). Jane E. Haley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Anthony H. Dickenson, George L. Wilcox, Paul F. Chapman, Ann F. Sullivan, M Schachter, Kelley F. Kitto, Erin M. Schuman, Daniel V. Madison, Michael T. Allen and Coleen M. Atkins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Brain Research, Neuron, European Journal of Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact