Daniela Grumme

11 papers receiving 575 citations

Peers

Daniela Grumme
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Developmental Neuroscience 116
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 56
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 256
  • Neurology 71
  • Aging 9
Replace Liangxue Zhou with:
Liangxue Zhou China
Diego Dolcetta Italy
Hanseul Park South Korea
Anna Kowalczyk Poland
Jaein Shin South Korea
Haigang Gu United States
Soyoung Choi South Korea
Nicholas P. Whitney United States
Ole Wiskow United States
Chris McKinnon United Kingdom
Daniela Grumme relative to Liangxue Zhou China Liangxue Zhou's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Liangxue Zhou · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniela Grumme

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniela Grumme's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniela Grumme with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniela Grumme more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniela Grumme

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniela Grumme. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniela Grumme. The network helps show where Daniela Grumme may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniela Grumme, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniela Grumme Line = papers co-authored together Daniela Grumme links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 2005227
2 200393
3 200575
4 202157
5 200552
6 202133
7 202422
8 202411
9 20214
10
SHORT COMMUNICATION A rat model of slow Wallerian degeneration (Wld S ) with improved preservation of neuromuscular synapses
20054
11 20253

About Daniela Grumme

Daniela Grumme is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biomaterials, Developmental Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 11 papers that have together received 581 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Nerve injury and regeneration (3 papers), Silk-based biomaterials and applications (3 papers), Bone Tissue Engineering Materials (2 papers), Sirtuins and Resveratrol in Medicine (2 papers), Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders (1 paper), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (1 paper) and NF-κB Signaling Pathways (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (116 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (56 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (256 citations), Neurology (71 citations) and Aging (9 citations). Daniela Grumme has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Michael P. Coleman, Diana Wagner, Richard R. Ribchester, Róbert Adalbert, Bogdan Beirowski, Klaus Addicks, Michael Schramm, Hajar Maleki, Marc Herb and Arzu Çelik. Their work appears in journals such as Molecular Biology of the Cell, Separation and Purification Technology, Frontiers in Immunology, Autophagy and ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact