Jane Day

13 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Jane Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Clinical Biochemistry 27
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 49
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 52
  • Rehabilitation 13
  • Molecular Biology 145
Replace Lisa W. Goldstone with:
Lisa W. Goldstone United States
Mekala Neelakantan United States
Mary‐Ann Bonney Australia
Gabriel David Pinilla-Monsalve Colombia
Yolanda Fernández‐Bullido Spain
Silvia Gallo Italy
Paolo Ghiglione Italy
M. Brown United States
Krzysztof Katulski Poland
Jason Siegel United States
Jane Day relative to Lisa W. Goldstone United States Lisa W. Goldstone's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Lisa W. Goldstone · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Day. The network helps show where Jane Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jane Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Day Line = papers co-authored together Jane Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006181
2 200457
3 198729
4 201428
5 198618
6 19948
7 19856
8
Interprofessional working : an essential guide for health- and social-care professionals
20065
9 20224
10 20094
11 20153
12
Benefits of infant massage.
20141
13 20061

About Jane Day

Jane Day is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Otorhinolaryngology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 345 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (1 paper), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (1 paper), Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (1 paper) and Global Health Workforce Issues (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (27 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (49 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (52 citations), Rehabilitation (13 citations) and Molecular Biology (145 citations). Jane Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Barry J. Byrne, Iris L. Gonzalez, William Thompson, Steven D. Colan, Randall M. Bryant, Julie Berthy, Carolyn T. Spencer, Andrea L. Behrman, Sarah E. Chesrown and Emily J. Fox. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Therapy, Pediatric Physical Therapy, Pediatric Pulmonology, Disability and health journal and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact