Jane Day

13 papers receiving 321 citations

Peers

Jane Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
  • Clinical Biochemistry 33
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 57
  • Occupational Therapy 11
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 58
  • Rehabilitation 17
Replace Mekala Neelakantan with:
Mekala Neelakantan United States
Ronit Mesterman Canada
Paolo Ghiglione Italy
Rikke Middelhede Hansen Denmark
Joan Jasien United States
Silvia Gallo Italy
Nicola Keay United Kingdom
Sylvia Huisman Netherlands
Elizabeth Dawson United States
Vedat Nacitarhan Türkiye
Jane Day relative to Mekala Neelakantan United States Mekala Neelakantan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Mekala Neelakantan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Day. The network helps show where Jane Day may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 15 scholars most cited alongside Jane Day, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Day Line = papers co-authored together Jane Day links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2006179
2 200456
3 198728
4 201428
5 198618
6 19948
7 19856
8
Interprofessional working : an essential guide for health- and social-care professionals
20065
9 20224
10 20094
11 20153
12
Benefits of infant massage.
20141
13 20061

About Jane Day

Jane Day is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Molecular Biology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 13 papers that have together received 341 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (4 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (3 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (2 papers), Metabolism and Genetic Disorders (1 paper), Cystic Fibrosis Research Advances (1 paper), Cultural Competency in Health Care (1 paper) and Problem and Project Based Learning (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Biochemistry (33 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (57 citations), Occupational Therapy (11 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (58 citations) and Rehabilitation (17 citations). Jane Day has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Julie Berthy, William Thompson, Carolyn T. Spencer, Barry J. Byrne, Randall M. Bryant, Steven D. Colan, Iris L. Gonzalez, Emily J. Fox, Sarah E. Chesrown and Andrea L. Behrman. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Therapy, Pediatric Physical Therapy, Pediatric Pulmonology, PEDIATRICS and Nurse Education Today.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact