Jan Schildmann

3.2k citations
167 papers · 1.9k · h-index 24

Impact in

Papers in

Jan Schildmann

151 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Jan Schildmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 792
  • General Health Professions 649
  • Health Informatics 18
  • Pharmacy 59
  • Family Practice 18
Replace Stella Reiter-Theil with:
Stella Reiter-Theil Switzerland
Daniel Tawfik United States
Daniel Z. Louis United States
Estela A. Beale United States
John McPhee Australia
Kelly Fryer‐Edwards United States
Katrina A. Bramstedt United States
Atsushi Asai Japan
Davene R. Wright United States
Anita J. Tarzian United States
Jan Schildmann relative to Stella Reiter-Theil Switzerland Stella Reiter-Theil's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Stella Reiter-Theil · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan Schildmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Schildmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Schildmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Schildmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan Schildmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Schildmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Schildmann. The network helps show where Jan Schildmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan Schildmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan Schildmann Line = papers co-authored together Jan Schildmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 167 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201494
2 201478
3 201370
4 201562
5 201861
6
Clinical Ethics Consultation: Theories and Methods, Implementation, Evaluation
201054
7 201344
8 201344
9 201139
10 200837
11 201437
12 201236
13 201935
14 200535
15 201534
16 201432
17 201530
18 201930
19 202030
20 201329

About Jan Schildmann

Jan Schildmann is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 167 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (55 papers), Ethics in medical practice (42 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (18 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (15 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (10 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (9 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (8 papers) and Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (792 citations), General Health Professions (649 citations), Health Informatics (18 citations), Pharmacy (59 citations) and Family Practice (18 citations). Jan Schildmann has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jochen Vollmann, Eva Schildmann, Sabine Salloch, Joschka Haltaufderheide, Claudia Bausewein, Nicole Burchardi, Flavio D’Abramo, Marjolein Gysels, Bert Molewijk and John‐Stewart Gordon. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Palliative Medicine, Journal of Medical Ethics, BMC Medical Ethics, BMC Palliative Care and Palliative Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact