Daniel Strech

4.3k citations
143 papers · 2.5k · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Daniel Strech

137 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers

Daniel Strech
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • General Health Professions 1.1k
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 284
  • Health Informatics 52
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 1.1k
  • Pharmacy 105
Replace David Wendler with:
David Wendler United States
Charles Weijer Canada
Kevin McGeechan Australia
Patrina Caldwell Australia
Barbara Mintzes Australia
Deborah A. Zarin United States
Tony Tse United States
Elizabeth Wager United Kingdom
Kenneth Getz United States
Jason W. Beckstead United States
Daniel Strech relative to David Wendler United States David Wendler's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
David Wendler · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Strech

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Strech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Strech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Strech more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Strech

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Strech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Strech. The network helps show where Daniel Strech may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Strech, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Daniel Strech Line = papers co-authored together Daniel Strech links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 143 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011124
2 201399
3 201889
4 200886
5 201685
6 201069
7 200864
8 201164
9 201563
10 201859
11 201156
12 200855
13 201353
14 201752
15 201652
16 201951
17 201247
18 201545
19 201844
20 200844

About Daniel Strech

Daniel Strech is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Physiology, having authored 143 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in Clinical Research (72 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (42 papers), Ethics in medical practice (30 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (28 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (24 papers), Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (19 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (17 papers) and Animal testing and alternatives (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.1k citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (284 citations), Health Informatics (52 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.1k citations) and Pharmacy (105 citations). Daniel Strech has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Neema Sofaer, Georg Marckmann, Hannes Kahrass, Marcel Mertz, Matthis Synofzik, Sabine Bossert, Susanne Wieschowski, Verina Wild, Ulrich Dirnagl and Marion Danis. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMC Medical Ethics, Journal of Medical Ethics, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology and PLoS Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact