Tenzin Wangmo

159 papers receiving 2.8k citations

Peers

Tenzin Wangmo
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
  • Health Informatics 102
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 49
  • Demography 386
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 472
  • Clinical Psychology 530
Replace Julia C.M. van Weert with:
Julia C.M. van Weert Netherlands
Camille Nebeker United States
Andrea L. Hartzler United States
Kristina Mikkonen Finland
Lorainne Tudor Car Singapore
Irena Papadopoulos United Kingdom
Susan Baxter United Kingdom
Matthias Weigl Germany
Anne M. Turner United States
Bridgette M. Bewick United Kingdom
Tenzin Wangmo relative to Julia C.M. van Weert Netherlands Julia C.M. van Weert's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Julia C.M. van Weert · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Tenzin Wangmo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Tenzin Wangmo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tenzin Wangmo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tenzin Wangmo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Tenzin Wangmo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tenzin Wangmo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tenzin Wangmo. The network helps show where Tenzin Wangmo may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Tenzin Wangmo, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Tenzin Wangmo Line = papers co-authored together Tenzin Wangmo links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 170 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017208
2 2017142
3 2019123
4 202085
5 201469
6 202164
7 201559
8 201852
9 202049
10 201547
11 201446
12 201644
13 202444
14 201643
15 201443
16 201842
17 202341
18 200939
19 202036
20 201635

About Tenzin Wangmo

Tenzin Wangmo is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, having authored 170 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (32 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (21 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (16 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (15 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (13 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (13 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (12 papers) and Elder Abuse and Neglect (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (102 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (49 citations), Demography (386 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (472 citations) and Clinical Psychology (530 citations). Tenzin Wangmo has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Bernice S. Elger, Reto W. Kressig, Marcello Ienca, Fabrice Jotterand, Violet Handtke, Eva De Clercq, Wiebke Bretschneider, Katharina M. Ruhe, Andrea Martani and Lester Darryl Geneviève. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Ethics, AJOB Empirical Bioethics, Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect, BMC Health Services Research and International Journal of Law and Psychiatry.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact