Bert Molewijk

3.6k citations
112 papers · 2.3k · h-index 28

Impact in

Papers in

Bert Molewijk

108 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Bert Molewijk
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • General Health Professions 1.4k
  • Pharmacy 188
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 694
  • Clinical Psychology 361
  • Information Systems and Management 129
Replace Joan McCarthy with:
Joan McCarthy Ireland
John D. Arras United States
Lauren Supplee United States
Anne J. Davis United States
Vangie Bergum Canada
Rebecca Barnes United Kingdom
Anne Honey Australia
Jason Adam Wasserman United States
Patrick H. DeLeon United States
Laura Duckett United States
Bert Molewijk relative to Joan McCarthy Ireland Joan McCarthy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joan McCarthy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bert Molewijk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bert Molewijk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bert Molewijk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bert Molewijk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bert Molewijk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bert Molewijk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bert Molewijk. The network helps show where Bert Molewijk may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Bert Molewijk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bert Molewijk Line = papers co-authored together Bert Molewijk links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 112 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004107
2 2009104
3 2009104
4 200787
5 201677
6 200374
7 201469
8 201168
9 201464
10 201864
11 201760
12 201052
13 200851
14 201450
15 201349
16 201748
17 201445
18 201342
19 201442
20 201839

About Bert Molewijk

Bert Molewijk is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Pharmacy, having authored 112 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ethics in medical practice (72 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (17 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (14 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (14 papers), Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (13 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (10 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (9 papers) and Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.4k citations), Pharmacy (188 citations), Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (694 citations), Clinical Psychology (361 citations) and Information Systems and Management (129 citations). Bert Molewijk has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Norway and United States. Frequent co-authors include Guy Widdershoven, Tineke Abma, Guy Widdershoven, Reidar Pedersen, Marit Helene Hem, Margreet Stolper, Anne M. Stiggelbout, J. Kievit, Wilma Otten and Elleke Landeweer. Their work appears in journals such as BMC Medical Ethics, Clinical Ethics, Bioethics, Journal of Medical Ethics and Medicine Health Care and Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact