Jan de Wit

1.6k citations
68 papers · 809 · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Jan de Wit

64 papers receiving 739 citations

Peers

Jan de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Social Psychology 257
  • Human-Computer Interaction 62
  • Applied Psychology 38
  • Artificial Intelligence 198
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 72
Replace Lydia Manikonda with:
Lydia Manikonda United States
Wally Smith Australia
William C. Schmidt United States
Yao Song China
Susannah B. F. Paletz United States
Kevin G. Stanley Canada
David Leiser Israel
Marko Dragojević United States
Jing Tian China
Jan de Wit relative to Lydia Manikonda United States Lydia Manikonda's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.5×
Lydia Manikonda · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan de Wit. The network helps show where Jan de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Jan de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197788
2 201880
3
Determinants and origins of aggressive behavior
197456
4 199044
5 202041
6 202034
7 202229
8 202028
9 199528
10 197625
11 202024
12 200922
13 199322
14 202221
15 201821
16 202019
17 201517
18
Animal manure: asset or liability?
199713
19 202213
20 201912

About Jan de Wit

Jan de Wit is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 68 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), AI in Service Interactions (12 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (6 papers), Mental Health via Writing (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (4 papers) and Robotics and Automated Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (257 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (62 citations), Applied Psychology (38 citations), Artificial Intelligence (198 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (72 citations). Jan de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Iran and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Paul Vogt, Emiel Krahmer, Willard W. Hartup, W. G. B. Huysmans, Willy Herroelen, Mirjam de Haas, Bram Willemsen, Alwin de Rooij, J.B. Schiere and H. van Keulen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Interacting with Computers, JMIR mhealth and uhealth, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products and Frontiers in Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact