Jan de Wit

1.7k citations
75 papers · 959 · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Jan de Wit

70 papers receiving 874 citations

Peers

Jan de Wit
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Social Psychology 297
  • Human-Computer Interaction 78
  • Applied Psychology 34
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 93
  • Computer Science Applications 40
Replace Emma Rose with:
Emma Rose United States
Preston A. Kiekel United States
Rita Latikka Finland
Robert J. Moore United States
Natalia Romero Netherlands
Rebecca Stafford New Zealand
Lei Hao China
Kevin G. Stanley Canada
Billy Sung Australia
Jan de Wit relative to Emma Rose United States Emma Rose's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.9×
Emma Rose · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jan de Wit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jan de Wit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan de Wit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan de Wit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jan de Wit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan de Wit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan de Wit. The network helps show where Jan de Wit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jan de Wit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jan de Wit Line = papers co-authored together Jan de Wit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 75 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197795
2 201890
3
Determinants and origins of aggressive behavior
197472
4 199051
5 202047
6 202037
7 202033
8 199533
9 202231
10 202028
11 202227
12 197625
13 199323
14 200922
15 201822
16 202420
17 202020
18 201519
19 201717
20 202216

About Jan de Wit

Jan de Wit is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Control and Systems Engineering, having authored 75 papers that have together received 959 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (16 papers), AI in Service Interactions (13 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (7 papers), Mental Health via Writing (5 papers), Hearing Impairment and Communication (5 papers), Digital Mental Health Interventions (5 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (5 papers) and Hand Gesture Recognition Systems (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (297 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (78 citations), Applied Psychology (34 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (93 citations) and Computer Science Applications (40 citations). Jan de Wit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Sweden and Iran. Frequent co-authors include Paul Vogt, Willard W. Hartup, Emiel Krahmer, W. G. B. Huysmans, Willy Herroelen, Mirjam de Haas, Bram Willemsen, Alwin de Rooij, J.B. Schiere and Stefan Kopp. Their work appears in journals such as Interacting with Computers, Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, Behavior Research Methods and Technology in Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact