Interacting with Computers

1.3k papers and 28.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.3k papers published in Interacting with Computers in the last decades have received a total of 28.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Interacting with Computers usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (674 papers), Sociology and Political Science (263 papers) and Artificial Intelligence (229 papers) specifically the topics of Usability and User Interface Design (331 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (222 papers) and Personal Information Management and User Behavior (127 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interacting with Computers are Donghee Shin, Jenny Preece, John M. Carroll, Stephen Fairclough, Ian Sommerville, Kraig Finstad, Gordon Baxter, D. Hawthorn, Noam Tractinsky and Adi Katz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Interacting with Computers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interacting with Computers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interacting with Computers.

Countries where authors publish in Interacting with Computers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interacting with Computers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interacting with Computers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interacting with Computers more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025