Interacting with Computers

39.9k citations
1.4k papers · · active since 1950

Impact in

Papers in

    • Usability and User Interface Design 333
    • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction 237
    • Interactive and Immersive Displays 115
    • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts 80
    • Personal Information Management and User Behavior 126
    • Technology Adoption and User Behaviour 81

Interacting with Computers

1.3k papers receiving 36.1k citations

Peers

Interacting with Computers
Comparison fields: 5 of 206
  • Human-Computer Interaction 13.0k
  • Information Systems and Management 5.8k
  • Computer Science Applications 2.7k
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 958
  • Social Psychology 6.3k
Replace ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction with:
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction United States
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing United States
Design Studies United Kingdom
Educational Research Review United States
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning United Kingdom
IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication United States
Design Issues United States
Journal of Educational Computing Research United States
Universal Access in the Information Society Spain
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication United States
Interacting with Computers relative to ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction United States ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · 1×
Citations per year

Countries where authors publish in Interacting with Computers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Interacting with Computers. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Interacting with Computers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interacting with Computers more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Interacting with Computers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Interacting with Computers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Interacting with Computers.

About Interacting with Computers

The 1.4k papers published in Interacting with Computers in the last decades have received a total of 39.9k indexed citations . Papers published in Interacting with Computers usually cover Human-Computer Interaction (697 papers), Information Systems and Management (202 papers), Human Factors and Ergonomics (44 papers), Computer Science Applications (72 papers) and Social Psychology (234 papers) specifically the topics of Usability and User Interface Design (333 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (237 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (126 papers), Interactive and Immersive Displays (115 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (95 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (82 papers), Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (81 papers) and Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts (80 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Interacting with Computers are Donghee Shin, Jenny Preece, John M. Carroll, Stephen Fairclough, Kraig Finstad, Ian Sommerville, Gordon Baxter, Jonathan Klein, Rosalind W. Picard and D. Hawthorn.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact