Emma Rose

1.7k citations
70 papers · 1.3k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Emma Rose

61 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Emma Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Human-Computer Interaction 337
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 106
  • Computer Science Applications 108
  • Occupational Therapy 52
  • Applied Psychology 52
Replace Foad Hamidi with:
Foad Hamidi United States
Inmaculada Fajardo Spain
Roberto Rodrigues Pereira Junior Brazil
Florian Brühlmann Switzerland
Kyle Montague United Kingdom
Erin L. Brady United States
Pirita Seitamaa‐Hakkarainen Finland
Karyn Moffatt Canada
Mona Leigh Guha United States
Tamara Clegg United States
Emma Rose relative to Foad Hamidi United States Foad Hamidi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Foad Hamidi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Rose. The network helps show where Emma Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Rose Line = papers co-authored together Emma Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 70 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017234
2 2019100
3 201681
4 201678
5 201754
6 201950
7 201749
8 200743
9 201441
10
Adapting User-Centered Design Methods to Design for Diverse Populations
200934
11 201828
12 201527
13 201826
14 201526
15 202122
16 202020
17 201120
18 202020
19 202017
20 201617

About Emma Rose

Emma Rose is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Management of Technology and Innovation, Computer Science Applications, Information Systems and Human Factors and Ergonomics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (27 papers), Persona Design and Applications (19 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (12 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (10 papers), Design Education and Practice (7 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (7 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (6 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (337 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (106 citations), Computer Science Applications (108 citations), Occupational Therapy (52 citations) and Applied Psychology (52 citations). Emma Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elin A. Björling, Cynthia Putnam, Beth E. Kolko, Rebecca Walton, Craig M. MacDonald, Jinghui Cheng, Josh Tenenberg, Andrew R. Davidson, Laura Gonzales and Maya Çakmak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction and Journal of Burn Care & Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact