Emma Rose

59 papers receiving 959 citations

Peers

Emma Rose
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Human-Computer Interaction 332
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 102
  • Computer Science Applications 104
  • Occupational Therapy 52
  • Applied Psychology 53
Replace Robin Brewer with:
Robin Brewer United States
Florian Brühlmann Switzerland
Inmaculada Fajardo Spain
Cosmin Munteanu Canada
Kathryn E. Ringland United States
Yavuz İnal Norway
Tim Coughlan United Kingdom
Abigail Durrant United Kingdom
Pierre Rabardel France
Jason Yip United States
Emma Rose relative to Robin Brewer United States Robin Brewer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Robin Brewer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emma Rose

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emma Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emma Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emma Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emma Rose

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emma Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emma Rose. The network helps show where Emma Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Emma Rose, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emma Rose Line = papers co-authored together Emma Rose links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 68 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201997
2 201678
3 201675
4 201753
5 201952
6 201748
7 200743
8 201438
9
Adapting User-Centered Design Methods to Design for Diverse Populations
200934
10 201827
11 201826
12 201525
13 201525
14 202120
15 202020
16 202020
17 201120
18 202017
19 202216
20 201615

About Emma Rose

Emma Rose is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems, Management of Technology and Innovation and Mechanical Engineering, having authored 68 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (27 papers), Persona Design and Applications (19 papers), Usability and User Interface Design (12 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (10 papers), Design Education and Practice (7 papers), ICT in Developing Communities (7 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (6 papers) and Digital Accessibility for Disabilities (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (332 citations), Human Factors and Ergonomics (102 citations), Computer Science Applications (104 citations), Occupational Therapy (52 citations) and Applied Psychology (53 citations). Emma Rose has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Elin A. Björling, Cynthia Putnam, Beth Kolko, Rebecca Walton, Craig M. MacDonald, Jinghui Cheng, Josh Tenenberg, Andrew R. Davidson, Laura Gonzales and Maya Çakmak. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, Technical Communication Quarterly, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, Preventive Medicine Reports and International Journal of Social Robotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact