Jamila Patterson

144 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

Jamila Patterson
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 1.2k
  • Pollution 1.5k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 484
  • Food Science 589
  • Biotechnology 254
Replace Binaya Bhusan Nayak with:
Binaya Bhusan Nayak India
Olimpia Pepe Italy
Aniello Anastasio Italy
Michael J. Rothrock United States
Bijay Kumar Behera India
Ameur Cherif Tunisia
A.M. Martin Spain
Marilyn C. Erickson United States
Oluwadara Alegbeleye Brazil
Zhao Chen China
Jamila Patterson relative to Binaya Bhusan Nayak India Binaya Bhusan Nayak's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Binaya Bhusan Nayak · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jamila Patterson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jamila Patterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jamila Patterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jamila Patterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jamila Patterson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jamila Patterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jamila Patterson. The network helps show where Jamila Patterson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jamila Patterson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jamila Patterson Line = papers co-authored together Jamila Patterson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 153 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019240
2 2020193
3 2019165
4 2020142
5 2020139
6 202092
7 202084
8 202184
9 197582
10 202175
11 202270
12 202269
13 202057
14 197755
15 197150
16 197848
17 202245
18 198445
19 197144
20 197834

About Jamila Patterson

Jamila Patterson is a scholar working on Pollution, Food Science, Animal Science and Zoology, Aquatic Science and Molecular Biology, having authored 153 papers that have together received 3.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (28 papers), Microplastics and Plastic Pollution (27 papers), Recycling and Waste Management Techniques (22 papers), Aquaculture Nutrition and Growth (18 papers), Identification and Quantification in Food (13 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (13 papers), Fish Biology and Ecology Studies (10 papers) and Aquaculture disease management and microbiota (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (1.2k citations), Pollution (1.5k citations), Animal Science and Zoology (484 citations), Food Science (589 citations) and Biotechnology (254 citations). Jamila Patterson has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include K. Immaculate Jeyasanta, Narmatha Sathish, J. K. Patterson Edward, Paul Gibbs, Andy M. Booth, J. G. Murray, R.L. Laju, Jane P. Sutherland, TA McMeekin and John F. Thompson. Their work appears in journals such as Marine Pollution Bulletin, British Poultry Science, International Journal of Food Science & Technology, The Science of The Total Environment and Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact