James Poling

66 papers receiving 4.0k citations

Peers

James Poling
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Toxicology 291
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 276
  • Clinical Psychology 1.2k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 922
  • Biological Psychiatry 110
Replace Johan Franck with:
Johan Franck Sweden
Gerhard A. Wiesbeck Switzerland
Charles A. Dackis United States
Kyle M. Kampman United States
Thomas F. Newton United States
Michael Soyka Germany
Karen Miotto United States
Stephanie S. O’Malley United States
Olivier Cottencin France
Kirsten C. Morley Australia
James Poling relative to Johan Franck Sweden Johan Franck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3.3×
Johan Franck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Poling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Poling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Poling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Poling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Poling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Poling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Poling. The network helps show where James Poling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Poling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Poling Line = papers co-authored together James Poling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010276
2 2009265
3 2009213
4 2009211
5 2009195
6 2005175
7 1997154
8 2006142
9 2003141
10 1998137
11 2005134
12 1997130
13 2005117
14 2007111
15 200399
16 201099
17 200397
18 200697
19 200691
20 200980

About James Poling

James Poling is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 67 papers that have together received 4.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (20 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (19 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (8 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (7 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (291 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (276 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.2k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (922 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (110 citations). James Poling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Mehmet Sofuoglu, Bruce J. Rounsaville, Henry R. Kranzler, Thomas R. Kosten, Joel Gelernter, Lindsay A. Farrer, Samuel A. Ball, Howard Tennen, Raymond F. Anton and R. Andrew Sewell. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal on Addictions, Neuropsychopharmacology, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Biological Psychiatry and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact