James Poling

66 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Peers

James Poling
Comparison fields: 5 of 111
  • Toxicology 265
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 251
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 851
  • Biological Psychiatry 99
Replace Kyle M. Kampman with:
Kyle M. Kampman United States
Johan Franck Sweden
Karen Miotto United States
Gerhard A. Wiesbeck Switzerland
Thomas F. Newton United States
Michael Soyka Germany
Kirsten C. Morley Australia
Stephanie S. O’Malley United States
John Grabowski United States
Adam Bisaga United States
James Poling relative to Kyle M. Kampman United States Kyle M. Kampman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Kyle M. Kampman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Poling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Poling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Poling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Poling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Poling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Poling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Poling. The network helps show where James Poling may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James Poling, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Poling Line = papers co-authored together James Poling links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 67 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010253
2 2009249
3 2009206
4 2009190
5 2009174
6 2005159
7 1997152
8 2003138
9 2006136
10 1998127
11 1997126
12 2005117
13 2005112
14 2007106
15 200395
16 201094
17 200693
18 200390
19 200687
20 200979

About James Poling

James Poling is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Clinical Psychology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 67 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (20 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (19 papers), Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (8 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (7 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (7 papers), Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis (6 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (4 papers) and Treatment of Major Depression (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (265 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (251 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (851 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (99 citations). James Poling has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Mehmet Sofuoglu, Bruce J. Rounsaville, Henry R. Kranzler, Thomas R. Kosten, Joel Gelernter, Lindsay A. Farrer, Samuel A. Ball, Howard Tennen, Raymond F. Anton and R. Andrew Sewell. Their work appears in journals such as Neuropsychopharmacology, American Journal on Addictions, Drug and Alcohol Dependence, Biological Psychiatry and Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact