James McSpiritt

549 citations
14 papers · 349 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

James McSpiritt

12 papers receiving 341 citations

Peers

James McSpiritt
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Global and Planetary Change 246
  • Environmental Engineering 114
  • Atmospheric Science 138
  • Spectroscopy 100
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 11
Replace Adil Shah with:
Adil Shah France
Alexander Gvakharia United States
Chelsea Fougère Canada
Emmaline Atherton Canada
Lambert A. Doezema United States
Shona E. Wilde United Kingdom
Travis W. Tokarek Canada
Truls Andersen Netherlands
Xuezhe Xu China
Boris Krasovitov Israel
James McSpiritt relative to Adil Shah France Adil Shah's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×7.5×
Adil Shah · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James McSpiritt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James McSpiritt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James McSpiritt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James McSpiritt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James McSpiritt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James McSpiritt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James McSpiritt. The network helps show where James McSpiritt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James McSpiritt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James McSpiritt Line = papers co-authored together James McSpiritt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201881
2 201875
3 201871
4 201746
5 201940
6 202316
7 20219
8 20255
9 20223
10 20171
11 20211
12 20191
13 20200
14 20240

About James McSpiritt

James McSpiritt is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Spectroscopy, Environmental Engineering and Waste Management and Disposal, having authored 14 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics (13 papers), Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols (10 papers), Spectroscopy and Laser Applications (9 papers), Atmospheric Ozone and Climate (3 papers), Water Quality Monitoring and Analysis (1 paper), Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena (1 paper), Oil Spill Detection and Mitigation (1 paper) and Laser Design and Applications (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Global and Planetary Change (246 citations), Environmental Engineering (114 citations), Atmospheric Science (138 citations), Spectroscopy (100 citations) and Process Chemistry and Technology (11 citations). James McSpiritt has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Mark A. Zondlo, Levi M. Golston, Shuting Lydia Yang, Michael B. Frish, Robert W. Talbot, Da Pan, Bernhard Buchholz, Dana Caulton, Lars P. Wendt and Xuehui Guo. Their work appears in journals such as Atmosphere, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, Atmospheric chemistry and physics, Optics Letters and Environmental Science & Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact