James E. Grace

1.3k citations
22 papers · 623 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

James E. Grace

21 papers receiving 573 citations

Peers

James E. Grace
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Internal Medicine 63
  • Pharmacology 158
  • Pharmaceutical Science 43
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 82
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 94
Replace Peter Dogterom with:
Peter Dogterom Netherlands
S. Vickers United States
Katja Breskvar Slovenia
Carmela Gnerre Switzerland
J. X. de Vries Germany
Vittorio Pinciroli Italy
Rebecca B. White United States
P Bechtel France
Thomas N. O’Connell United States
James Atherton United States
James E. Grace relative to Peter Dogterom Netherlands Peter Dogterom's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Peter Dogterom · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James E. Grace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. Grace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. Grace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. Grace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. Grace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. Grace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. Grace. The network helps show where James E. Grace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James E. Grace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James E. Grace Line = papers co-authored together James E. Grace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000172
2 201178
3 200667
4 200941
5 200640
6 200729
7 201526
8 199826
9 200422
10 196920
11 200617
12 201216
13 201515
14 200012
15 201512
16 19668
17 19697
18 20066
19 20174
20 20122

About James E. Grace

James E. Grace is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 623 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (5 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (4 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (3 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (2 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (2 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers) and Adipose Tissue and Metabolism (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Internal Medicine (63 citations), Pharmacology (158 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (43 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (82 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (94 citations). James E. Grace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Sean Ekins, Steven Wrighton, Barbara J. Ring, Kimberley A. Lentz, Scott Grossman, Carol Gleason, Punit H. Marathe, Daniel G. Morgan, Patrick Y. S. Lam and Donald Pinto. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, Xenobiotica, Blood and Physiology & Behavior.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact